This newly digitalized dimension is recent to our technician world, at least it is as a public source, but the mere circumstance of its existence speaks of a stage in the modern world civilization in which we have finally agreed in sharing an outstanding source of power: information.
Looking superficially into the world of digital communications, its structure reveals a lacking center of control. Digital information is confined, following the same pattern that creates it; it is more of a constellation of stars or a spider web rather than a pyramid or a circle. Thus the access to this information lacks from its origins, a centralized source of control; everyone can access it and produce it. Moderate literacy is required to have make use of it and enormous potential is acquired by those who do it.
Corporations may have access to resources and economic models of marketing, politicians are in control of stability but people like never before has access to powerful information. We are not considering secret codes, war plans, marketing stocks, what we value here is the power of expression enacted by the individual. In contrast with the controversial forum of international negotiations, or a conference dictating the focus of discoveries, or a lecture assigning participants the role of listeners, the digital route respects race, color, gender and age. Religious believes are not segregated from a convergent flow of personal opinions. Disobedience emerges as the emancipation against silence, against taking turns or against speaking the truth.
This attempt of empowering our own voice, when expanded to a mass of billion people, begins counting. A group turns into a community and later into a society of a nation and of the world. Never before has an individual been allowed to defeat the loneliness and hopeless assumed by its limited condition of singularity. The digital dimension has convinced us of the possibility to reach out, to take the lead and to stand above in the crowds while becoming united with all others.
I am here is the prevailing message, presence through texts and images revealing the character value of an idea, a vote counting for one consumer at a time, a person´s choice counted as a client, the individual ideas of a student, the rights demanded as a citizen.
Round the earth we have the possibility of contact. This is an amazing possibility among all human beings. The more we enact our choices, critiques, votes and requests, even though virtually, the more strength as public and society we gain.
One important step into the future is the capacity to organize ourselves as we evolve with the information we share. It is naïve to expect this computerized devise of communication will support a status quo. How can we organize our societies?
These reflections lead next not only to the meaning of digital disobedience but to the end of it. The outcome or the enactment is blurry. I personally consider that a disobedience which takes place in written only, regardless of the number of followers, is somehow hollow. More important than the number of followers, is the result of the expression. I have not seen anything yet which reveals a change. In a way, as we dare to express electronically, we are hiding behind a shield of technology which original purpose was not that of integration of social webs. How are the manifestations of opposition and dissatisfaction we state in the internet turning into a solid change? It is intangible, still, perhaps this is the stage of babbling and later involvement will be able to tip actions but nothing yet apparently.
The problems we face in the 21st Century demand proportional solutions. Maybe this is the beginning of a collective awareness which will mature into attitude, behavior and action. However, there is risk in supporting second and third hand information. We are also in the era of masking truth and we do not know if there is really any one real. We ignore the real issues and even issues which are hidden from our reach.
As we all embark in the electronic crusade, we ignore the individual who goes side to side in live with us. We devaluate direct dialog or deny it if it doesn´t reach us through an electronic messenger. When we realize about this dehumanization of electronic communication, it may be to late to rescue real human relationships. There are extremes of the absurd when family members living under the same roof communicate amongst themselves electronically, only! Students have not had a printed book any more. Physicians produce prescriptions across the ocean for patients they only knew by an electronic file.
What are we disobeying? Who will reprehend us? I suspect we are all aligned ding exactly what an evil mind formulated. Leaving behind the real power which emerges from a personal relation and from individual responsibility, rather than fantasizing about a collective heroic reaction somewhere in cyber dimension.
Haven´t we learn something during the last millennia of our civilization? The far we go from nature the more difficult it will turn to survive. The answers are not in technology but in spirituality, we need to reach in, to find inside to start with us and limit the actions to the control of our infinite wants. If everybody does the same, instead of writing electronically abut it, we may change. We must realize first that the phantom we are all fighting is a mirror image of our own behavior collectively. We all have demands for gods and services, thus we support a capitalist economy which sets unfair rules for developing nations.
We have children perpetuating the oversize population that the earth can carry and in time producing waste that can not longer is recycled. We have forgotten our ancestors and have no ties to place, nor to wilderness. Under these circumstances, who can write the first complain?